Blog

Home   >   Sunroom   >   Top 10 Green House Builds in China: Glass Greenhouse, Aluminium Frames and Orangerie Specs with FOB Pricing

Top 10 Green House Builds in China: Glass Greenhouse, Aluminium Frames and Orangerie Specs with FOB Pricing

Aluminium green house with tempered glass walls and twin-wall polycarbonate roof in a residential garden in China - glass greenhouse frame with open ridge vents
An aluminium green house supplied from China: 6063-T5 glazing bars, tempered safety glass side walls, twin-wall polycarbonate roof panels and continuous ridge ventilation.
A green house is a plant-production enclosure, and that single fact changes almost every specification decision. A conservatory is sized for human comfort on winter evenings; a green house is sized for photons per square metre in February and for the snow load that sits on the roof while it does it. This page works through the engineering of an aluminium-framed green house: snow and wind actions under EN 1991, glazing bar spans for seven extrusion sizes, glass pane sizing to EN 16612, twin-wall polycarbonate expansion, PAR transmission, a worked heating calculation for an 8 x 12 m house, ventilation areas, condensation control, and the fertiliser and sulphur chemistry that attacks aluminium frames. FOB prices, MOQ, container loading and installation failure points are at the end.
FOB price
48-260 USD/m2

Peak heating load
105-338 W/m2

Frame wall thickness
1.5-3.0 mm

Glazing bar span
0.80-3.91 m

MOQ
1 set / 20 m2

Lead time
20-35 days

Contents
1. Green house, conservatory, orangerie, sunroom
2. Aluminium greenhouse frames and bar spans
3. Glass greenhouse glazing and pane sizing
4. Twin-wall polycarbonate
5. Light transmission, diffusion and PAR
6. Heating load: worked calculation
7. Ventilation sizing and fan selection
8. Condensation, VPD and drip
9. Corrosion and coating specification
10. Conservatory specification
11. Orangerie greenhouse specification
12. Manufacturing process and inspection
13. FOB pricing, MOQ and container loading
14. Installation and failure points
15. Two projects and material comparison
16. RFQ checklist and glossary

Green House, Conservatory, Orangerie and Sunroom: Four Different Design Targets

Buyers use these four words interchangeably, and suppliers quote them from the same catalogue. They are not the same product. The difference shows up in four numbers: the winter internal design temperature, the target light transmission, the ventilation rate, and the glazing safety class required overhead. Get those four wrong and the structure will be either over-specified for its use or non-compliant.

Four structures, four design targets

Type Primary purpose Winter setpoint Typical covering Ventilation Overhead glazing
Green house Plant production: light and yield 12-18 deg C by crop 4 mm horticultural glass or 6-16 mm PC 15-25% of floor area Horticultural glass or PC
Glass greenhouse Production with maximum PAR 12-18 deg C by crop Diffuse AR glass 4 mm, low iron 15-25% + ridge Tempered or PC
Conservatory Occupied living space 19-21 deg C IGU 4-12-4 walls, 6-16-6 roof Background + purge Laminated inner pane, EN 14449
Orangerie Living space with solid ceiling 19-21 deg C Solid roof perimeter + glazed lantern Background + purge Laminated, limited area
Sunroom Occupied, mostly 3-season 18-21 deg C IGU walls, insulated roof panels Windows + roof vents Laminated

A green house and a conservatory can look identical from the garden and differ by a factor of three in heating demand. The green house is deliberately leaky and single-glazed because ventilation and light matter more than heat retention; the conservatory is sealed and double-glazed because the occupant, not the plant, sets the comfort target. If you are specifying a structure that will be sat in, follow the same rules as for a four-season sunroom or a Wintergarten conservatory, not the rules on this page.

Reading a specification: which standard applies to which

Order-writing note: state the design code, the ground snow load, the basic wind velocity and the roof shape coefficient in the purchase order. “Standard greenhouse” is not a load case, and the difference between sk = 0.75 and sk = 2.20 kN/m2 roughly halves the permissible glazing bar span.

Aluminium Greenhouse Frames: Alloy, Wall Thickness and Glazing Bar Span

Ninety per cent of a green house frame is one repeated member: the glazing bar that runs from eave to ridge and carries the covering. Its span is set by snow, and its size is set by deflection rather than strength. The tables below are computed for 6063-T5 with E = 70 GPa and a design strength of 118 MPa (Rp0.2 = 130 MPa divided by gammaM1 = 1.10 per EN 1999-1-1).

Extrusion sections used in greenhouse frames

Ref Section (mm) I (cm4) W (cm3) Mass (kg/m) Typical use
P1 40 x 30 x 1.5 2.9 1.95 0.54 Glazing bar, short spans only
P2 50 x 40 x 1.8 8.0 4.01 0.84 Glazing bar, mild snow
P3 60 x 40 x 2.0 10.2 5.11 1.04 Glazing bar, standard
P4 80 x 50 x 2.0 21.7 8.67 1.36 Glazing bar, snow regions
P5 100 x 50 x 2.5 32.0 12.81 1.96 Ridge / purlin
P6 120 x 60 x 3.0 66.4 22.14 2.82 Gutter beam, 4-5 m bays
P7 150 x 80 x 3.0 153.7 38.43 3.63 Valley beam, multi-span

Wall thickness in a greenhouse frame runs 1.5-2.0 mm on glazing bars, 2.0-2.5 mm on posts and ridge, and 2.5-3.0 mm on gutters and valley beams. Anything thinner than 1.5 mm on a load-bearing bar will not survive the thread-forming screws used to fix the glazing clips, and will not meet the local buckling check in EN 1999-1-1 for a Class B section in this depth range.

Load cases: ground snow to roof snow

EN 1991-1-3 converts ground snow sk to roof snow with a shape coefficient mu. For a duo-pitch greenhouse roof at 22 degrees, mu = 0.8. For multi-span Venlo types the valleys collect drift and sliding snow and mu can reach 2.0-3.0, which is why a Venlo gutter is a much heavier member than a domestic gutter. Add a dead load of 0.30 kN/m2 for 4 mm glass plus bar self-weight plus fixings. Asymmetric load (full snow on one slope, half on the other) must also be checked on spans over 4 m.

Case Ground snow sk mu Roof snow + dead Total q Typical region
LC1 0.50 kN/m2 0.8 0.40 0.30 0.70 kN/m2 Coastal UK, mild winter
LC2 1.00 kN/m2 0.8 0.80 0.30 1.10 kN/m2 Central Europe, Netherlands
LC3 1.50 kN/m2 0.8 1.20 0.30 1.50 kN/m2 Scandinavia, Alpine foothills
LC4 2.20 kN/m2 0.8 1.76 0.30 2.06 kN/m2 Quebec, NBCC 2020
LC5 1.50 kN/m2 2.0 3.00 0.30 3.30 kN/m2 Multi-span valley drift

Maximum glazing bar span, glass covering (deflection L/150, 12 mm cap)

The 12 mm absolute cap comes from the glass engagement depth in the bar channel: standard greenhouse glazing bars hold the pane on a 12-15 mm land with an EPDM gasket. Beyond roughly 12 mm of bar deflection the pane can walk out of the channel or the edge stress rises enough to crack it during a frost. Span below is for a simply supported bar; values in metres.

Case Bar spacing P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7
LC1 (0.70) 0.60 m 1.35 1.87 1.98 2.40 2.64 3.17 3.91
LC1 (0.70) 0.75 m 1.25 1.76 1.88 2.27 2.50 3.00 3.70
LC1 (0.70) 1.00 m 1.14 1.60 1.73 2.11 2.33 2.79 3.44
LC2 (1.10) 0.60 m 1.16 1.63 1.76 2.14 2.36 2.83 3.50
LC2 (1.10) 0.75 m 1.08 1.51 1.64 2.02 2.23 2.68 3.31
LC2 (1.10) 1.00 m 0.98 1.37 1.49 1.88 2.08 2.49 3.08
LC3 (1.50) 0.60 m 1.04 1.47 1.59 1.98 2.18 2.62 3.23
LC3 (1.50) 0.75 m 0.97 1.36 1.48 1.87 2.06 2.48 3.06
LC3 (1.50) 1.00 m 0.88 1.24 1.34 1.73 1.92 2.31 2.85
LC4 (2.06) 0.60 m 0.94 1.32 1.43 1.83 2.02 2.42 2.99
LC4 (2.06) 0.75 m 0.88 1.22 1.33 1.71 1.91 2.29 2.83
LC4 (2.06) 1.00 m 0.80 1.11 1.21 1.55 1.77 2.13 2.63

Two things jump out. First, spacing matters more than it looks: going from 600 mm bar centres to 1000 mm costs about 15 per cent of the allowable span, because the load on each bar scales with the tributary width while the section stays the same. Second, the step from P3 to P4 (60 x 40 x 2.0 to 80 x 50 x 2.0) roughly doubles I for a 36 per cent mass increase, and that is the single cheapest way to buy 40-50 per cent more span. I scales with the cube of the section depth, so a deeper bar always beats a thicker wall.

Same table for polycarbonate covering (L/100, 20 mm cap)

Case Bar spacing P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7
LC1 (0.70) 0.75 m 1.43 2.01 2.13 2.58 2.84 3.41 4.21
LC2 (1.10) 0.75 m 1.23 1.73 1.88 2.30 2.54 3.05 3.76
LC3 (1.50) 0.75 m 1.11 1.56 1.69 2.13 2.35 2.82 3.48
LC4 (2.06) 0.75 m 1.00 1.40 1.52 1.96 2.17 2.60 3.21

Polycarbonate tolerates more deflection than glass, so allowable spans are 12-16 per cent longer for the same section. That is not a free win: PC sheets also need an expansion gap that glass does not, and the sheet pulls out of a shallow channel long before the bar actually fails. The governing condition for PC is usually sheet retention, not bar deflection.

Deflection, not strength: in every row above the bending stress utilisation is under 45 per cent when the deflection limit is reached. If a supplier sizes a green house frame on “strength”, the structure will be stiff enough only by accident.

Glass Greenhouse Glazing: Pane Size, Thickness and Safety Overhead

A glass greenhouse is the reference against which every other covering is measured, because glass holds its light transmission for 30 years and polycarbonate does not. The engineering question is simply how big a pane a given thickness will carry.

Maximum pane short span by thickness and load

For a pane with an aspect ratio of 2:1 or longer, the plate behaves as a one-way strip and the edge stress is sigma = 0.75 x p x a-squared / t-squared, where a is the short span. Design bending strengths below are EN 16612 characteristic values divided by a material factor of 1.8: 25.0 MPa annealed, 38.9 MPa heat-strengthened, 66.7 MPa fully tempered. Spans are in metres; the second column is the resulting pane area at 2:1.

Total load p Glass type t = 3 mm t = 4 mm t = 5 mm t = 6 mm t = 8 mm t = 10 mm
0.70 kN/m2 (LC1) Annealed 0.65 0.87 1.09 1.31 1.75 2.18
0.70 kN/m2 (LC1) Tempered 1.07 1.43 1.78 2.14 2.85 3.56
1.10 kN/m2 (LC2) Annealed 0.52 0.70 0.87 1.04 1.39 1.74
1.10 kN/m2 (LC2) Tempered 0.86 1.14 1.42 1.71 2.27 2.84
2.06 kN/m2 (LC4) Annealed 0.38 0.51 0.64 0.76 1.02 1.27
2.06 kN/m2 (LC4) Tempered 0.62 0.83 1.04 1.25 1.66 2.08
3.30 kN/m2 (LC5) Tempered 0.49 0.66 0.82 0.99 1.31 1.64

The 4 mm annealed row at LC1 gives 0.87 m, which is why traditional Dutch horticultural glass is cut at roughly 730 mm wide: that is the number the physics gives you, not a tradition. Move to 4 mm tempered and the same load allows 1.43 m, which is why modern wide-pane greenhouses are tempered as standard. In Quebec at 2.06 kN/m2, 4 mm tempered drops to 0.83 m, so the standard 4 mm pane is no longer workable and the spec has to move to 5 or 6 mm, or to a narrower bar spacing.

Safety glazing overhead and hail

Horticultural glass is annealed float, typically 4 mm, and it breaks into long shards. Where a structure is a workplace or is accessible to the public, overhead glazing has to be safety glazing: EN 12150 thermally toughened, or EN 14449 laminated if post-breakage retention is required. ANSI Z97.1 and CPSC 16 CFR 1201 apply in the US. For a domestic green house the practical options are tempered glass, laminated glass, or a safety film applied to the inside face of annealed glass.

Hazard 4 mm annealed 4 mm tempered 6 mm tempered 16 mm PC Note
Human impact Fail (shards) Pass Pass Pass EN 12600 1B1 / 1C1
Post-breakage retention None None (crumbles) None High Laminate or film if required
Hail 20 mm Marginal Pass Pass Pass Terminal velocity ~ 14 m/s
Hail 30 mm Fail Marginal Pass Pass Terminal velocity ~ 17 m/s
Hail 45 mm Fail Fail Marginal Pass Alpine / Great Plains regions
NiS spontaneous break Rare 1 in 8-10 t 1 in 8-10 t n/a Heat-soak to EN 14179

Heat-soak testing to EN 14179 costs 4-7 USD/m2 and reduces the spontaneous nickel-sulphide breakage rate of tempered glass by roughly an order of magnitude. On a large glass greenhouse roof it is worth specifying, because a pane that lets go in February over a cropped bed does more damage than the pane costs.

Twin-Wall Polycarbonate: U-Value, Light and the Expansion Gap

Twin-wall and multi-wall polycarbonate is the default roof covering on domestic and hobby structures because it is light, does not shatter and takes impact. The trade-offs are lower light transmission, a shorter service life, and a coefficient of thermal expansion seven times that of glass.

Sheet specification comparison

Sheet Structure Mass U (wall) U (roof) Light trans. Expected life FOB USD/m2
4 mm float glass Monolithic 10.0 kg/m2 5.8 6.9 90% 30+ yr 6-9
4 mm diffuse AR glass Monolithic, etched 10.0 kg/m2 5.8 6.9 91% 30+ yr 14-18
6 mm twin-wall PC 2 wall 1.3 kg/m2 3.0 3.3 82% 10 yr 7-10
8 mm twin-wall PC 2 wall 1.5 kg/m2 2.7 3.0 80% 10 yr 9-12
10 mm twin-wall PC 2 wall 1.7 kg/m2 2.5 2.8 79% 10-12 yr 11-15
16 mm 3-wall PC 3 wall 2.5 kg/m2 2.0 2.3 78% 10-12 yr 15-20
16 mm 5-wall PC 5 wall 3.0 kg/m2 1.7 2.0 76% 12-15 yr 18-24
25 mm 5-wall PC 5 wall 3.8 kg/m2 1.3 1.6 72% 12-15 yr 26-34
200 um PE film Double inflated 0.4 kg/m2 2.5 2.8 80% 4 yr 1.5-2.5

Note the U-value split between wall and roof. EN 673 uses an internal surface resistance of 0.13 m2K/W for horizontal heat flow and 0.10 for upward heat flow, so the same sheet is measurably worse on a roof than on a wall: 4 mm glass goes from 5.8 to 6.9 W/m2K. Any heat-loss calculation that uses one number for the whole envelope under-estimates the roof by 15-20 per cent, and the roof is half the envelope.

Thermal expansion: PC moves 7x as much as glass

Material Alpha (1/K) 1 m sheet, dT 40 K 2 m sheet, dT 40 K 2 m sheet, dT 60 K 4 m sheet, dT 60 K
Glass 9e-6 0.36 mm 0.72 mm 1.08 mm 2.16 mm
Aluminium 23e-6 0.92 mm 1.84 mm 2.76 mm 5.52 mm
Polycarbonate 65e-6 2.60 mm 5.20 mm 7.80 mm 15.60 mm
Steel 12e-6 0.48 mm 0.96 mm 1.44 mm 2.88 mm

A 2 m PC sheet spanning a 60 K swing wants to grow 7.8 mm. Fit it tight between two glazing bars and that movement has nowhere to go, so the sheet buckles, pulls out of the channel, or cracks around its fixing holes. The rules that follow from the table are simple and are the most common cause of warranty claims on polycarbonate roofs.

Which thickness to buy

Light Transmission, Diffusion and PAR: The Number Growers Buy

Suppliers quote light transmission, LT, measured across the whole solar spectrum. Plants use photosynthetically active radiation, PAR, between 400 and 700 nm. The two numbers are close but not identical, and neither is the whole story, because diffuse light penetrates a canopy better than direct light.

LT, PAR and haze

Covering LT (solar) PAR trans. Haze / diffusion Notes
4 mm clear float 90% 88% 0% Direct light, hard shadow, hot spots
4 mm low-iron float 91.5% 90% 0% +2 PAR points for 1-2 USD/m2
4 mm diffuse AR glass 91% 89% 55-70% Best PAR x distribution product
6 mm twin-wall PC 82% 80% Low Flutes give some diffusion
16 mm 5-wall PC 76% 74% Medium Five walls = five interfaces
Diffusing PC 78% 76% 65% Good for ornamentals, weak for tomato
200 um PE film 88% 86% Low Condensate drops cut effective PAR 8-12%
ETFE film 95% 93% Low Highest transmission, poor U-value

Every air-to-solid interface costs roughly 4 per cent reflection, and every additional wall in a polycarbonate sheet adds two. That is why a 5-wall sheet, with ten interfaces, lands at 76 per cent, and why an anti-reflection coating on glass is worth 2-3 transmission points for very little money.

The 1 per cent light rule and why it dominates the U-value argument

For a high-wire tomato crop the working rule is that 1 per cent of additional PAR is worth roughly 0.7-1.0 per cent of annual yield. Using 0.8 per cent and a 40 kg/m2 crop: dropping from 90 per cent LT glass to 76 per cent LT polycarbonate is a relative loss of 15.6 per cent, worth about 12.5 per cent of yield, or 480 kg on a 96 m2 house. At 1.60 USD/kg that is 768 USD per year of lost crop. The heat saved by the same swap is 1,742 USD per year in Rotterdam but only 572 USD per year of that is a genuine gain once the yield loss is netted off against a cheaper option that keeps the light.

That is the whole argument in one paragraph. In a production green house, buying U-value with transmission is a bad trade. Buy U-value with a thermal screen instead: the screen is retracted during the day, so it costs nothing in light and still cuts the night loss by roughly 45 per cent. In a conservatory, an orangerie or any structure where nobody is weighing tomatoes, the trade inverts, and thick polycarbonate or IGU is the right answer.

Heating Load on a Green House: Worked Calculation for 8 x 12 m

Reference house: 8.0 m wide, 12.0 m long, 2.5 m eaves, 1.60 m rise, 22 degree duo-pitch roof. Floor 96 m2. Wall area 100 m2, gable triangles 12.8 m2, roof 103.4 m2 (slope length 4.31 m), internal volume 316.8 m3. Infiltration at 0.8 air changes per hour adds 85 W/K.

Surface Area Note
Walls (vertical) 100.0 m2 Perimeter 40 m x 2.5 m
Gable triangles 12.8 m2 2 x (8.0 x 1.6 / 2)
Roof (2 slopes) 103.4 m2 Slope length 4.31 m x 12 m x 2
Total envelope 216.2 m2 2.25 x floor area
Internal volume 316.8 m3 Drives infiltration and ventilation

Envelope area is 2.25 times floor area. Any quote expressed per square metre of floor has to be divided by 2.25 to be compared with a per-square-metre glazing price, and that is where most budget errors start.

Peak load and annual energy by covering

Spec Covering UA (W/K) Peak W/m2 Rotterdam kWh/yr Toronto kWh/yr Quebec kWh/yr
S1 4 mm glass walls + 6 mm PC roof 1,080 225 32,763 56,165 64,158
S2 4 mm glass walls + 16 mm PC roof 946 197 28,686 49,175 56,173
S3 16 mm PC walls + 16 mm PC roof 506 105 15,341 26,299 30,042
S4 IGU walls + laminated IGU roof 699 146 21,215 36,369 41,544
S5 S1 + internal thermal screen 632 132 19,162 32,849 37,524

Peak loads are the sizing number: 225 W/m2 for a single-glazed house in a mild winter is in line with the 150-250 W/m2 that Dutch and British growers actually install, and 338 W/m2 at a 30 K difference matches what a Quebec grower budgets. Annual figures use degree-days to a balance temperature of 13 deg C (Rotterdam 1,750, Toronto 3,000, Quebec City 4,050 K.d), a condensing boiler efficiency of 0.90, and a free solar-gain factor of 0.65 for the two mid-latitude sites and 0.55 for Quebec, where winter sun is worth less. The resulting 341 kWh/m2 for single glass in the Netherlands sits inside the 320-420 kWh/m2 that Dutch holding records report, which is the check that matters.

The single largest driver is not the covering, it is infiltration. UA of 1,080 W/K includes only 85 W/K of air change. Take a badly sealed house at 2.0 ACH instead of 0.8 and UA rises by 127 W/K, which costs more than the entire upgrade from 6 mm to 16 mm polycarbonate roof sheet. Sealing the laps and the door is the cheapest kilowatt-hour in the building.

Payback on the four upgrade options

Option Measure Capex USD Rotterdam saving/yr Quebec saving/yr Payback Rotterdam Payback Quebec
U1 16 mm 5-wall PC roof instead of 6 mm 1,428 407 799 3.5 yr 1.8 yr
U2 16 mm PC walls and roof instead of glass 3,108 1,742 3,412 1.8 yr 0.9 yr
U3 Internal thermal screen on S1 2,304 1,360 2,664 1.7 yr 0.9 yr
U4 Diffuse AR glass walls 1,008 73 (yield) 73 (yield) 13.7 yr 13.7 yr

U2 looks like the winner on pure payback, and for a hobby house it is. For a production house it is not, because U2 costs 14 points of light transmission, worth roughly 768 USD per year of yield on a tomato crop. Netting that off, U2 returns 974 USD per year in Rotterdam against 1,360 USD for U3 at a lower capital cost, and U3 costs no light at all. The screen wins on every axis except simplicity.

Sizing the heater: take the peak load and add 10 per cent for cold-start recovery and 15 per cent if the house is heated from cold overnight. For S1 in Rotterdam that is 21.6 kW x 1.25 = 27 kW, i.e. a 27-30 kW unit. Undersizing by 25 per cent is the most common heating complaint and it shows up only on the three coldest nights of the year.

Related reading on glazed structures and their thermal behaviour: four-season sunroom engineering, glass greenhouse supplier specifications, and skylight and roof glazing U-values.

Ventilation: Sizing Ridge and Side Openings, and When You Need a Fan

A green house at midday in May can reach 45 deg C inside with the vents shut. Ventilation is not a comfort accessory, it is the cooling system, and it is sized from the floor area rather than from the volume.

Free area and the opening angle penalty

The standard rule for natural ventilation is a total vent free area of 15-25 per cent of floor area, split between ridge and side openings. For the 96 m2 reference house that is 14.4-24.0 m2. A continuous ridge vent 1.0 m wide over 12 m is 12 m2 gross, and a pair of side vents 1.0 m high over 12 m is 24 m2 gross. The trap is that a vent hinged at the top does not deliver its full geometric area: the free opening is the vertical projection, so effective area is roughly the geometric area multiplied by the sine of the opening angle.

Opening angle Effective free area Ridge (12 m2 gross) Side (24 m2 gross) Combined effective
15 deg 26% 3.1 m2 6.2 m2 2.8 m2
30 deg 50% 6.0 m2 12.0 m2 5.4 m2
45 deg 71% 8.5 m2 17.0 m2 7.6 m2
60 deg 87% 10.4 m2 20.9 m2 9.3 m2
90 deg 100% 12.0 m2 24.0 m2 10.7 m2

Combined effective area is the series combination of inlet and outlet, 1 / sqrt(1/A1-squared + 1/A2-squared). A common specification error is to buy a ridge vent opening to 15 degrees because the opener travel is short, and then wonder why the house still overheats: at 15 degrees you are ventilating with 2.8 m2, not 12 m2.

Stack-effect airflow: how much a chimney actually moves

Buoyancy-driven flow is Q = Cd x Aeff x sqrt(2 x g x h x dT / Ti), with Cd about 0.45 once an insect screen is fitted, h the height between inlet and outlet centre, and Ti in kelvin. For the reference house with h = 2.0 m and Ti = 305 K:

Inside-outside dT Stack velocity Vent angle Airflow m3/h Air changes / h
3 K 0.62 m/s 15 deg 2,796 8.8
3 K 0.62 m/s 30 deg 5,401 17.0
3 K 0.62 m/s 45 deg 7,638 24.1
8 K 1.01 m/s 15 deg 4,566 14.4
8 K 1.01 m/s 30 deg 8,820 27.8
8 K 1.01 m/s 45 deg 12,473 39.4
8 K 1.01 m/s 60 deg 15,277 48.2

The design target for summer ventilation is 0.010-0.015 m3/s per m2 of floor, which for 96 m2 is 3,456-5,184 m3/h. Natural ventilation delivers that at any opening angle above about 20 degrees even with a modest 3 K temperature difference. Fans are therefore not a substitute for vent area; they are a supplement for still, humid days when the stack effect collapses.

Condensation, VPD and the Drip Line Under the Glazing Bar

Condensation forms on the coldest surface first, which in a green house is always the covering, and then runs along the underside of the glazing bar until it drips. That drip line is where seedlings rot and where botrytis starts.

Why the covering wets before the frame

In a heated house at 15 deg C and 85 per cent RH, the dew point is 12.5 deg C. Single glass at an outside temperature of 0 deg C has an inside surface temperature of about 4 deg C, so it is 8.5 K below dew point and water forms continuously. A 16 mm polycarbonate roof at the same conditions sits at about 11 deg C, still below dew point but much closer, which is one more reason the thicker sheet behaves better in practice than its U-value alone suggests.

Covering U (roof) Inside surface temp at 0 deg C out / 15 deg C in Below dew point (12.5) by Condensation
4 mm single glass 6.9 3.9 deg C 8.6 K Continuous run-off
6 mm twin-wall PC 3.3 8.6 deg C 3.9 K Film then droplets
10 mm twin-wall PC 2.8 9.7 deg C 2.8 K Film mainly
16 mm 5-wall PC 2.0 11.5 deg C 1.0 K Occasional
4-12-4 IGU 3.0 9.3 deg C 3.2 K Film mainly
6-16-6 laminated IGU 2.2 11.0 deg C 1.5 K Occasional

The same surface-temperature logic applies to the frame. A non-thermally-broken aluminium bar at an outside temperature of 0 deg C will sit at 3-5 deg C, and water running off the glass collects on it. The temperature factor fRsi, calculated to EN ISO 13788, is the formal check: below 0.70 you get surface condensation, below 0.80 you get mould growth on any organic dust that settles there.

Controlling it: vent heat, or raise the surface temperature

There are only three ways to stop condensation on a surface, and they are not equally cheap. Dehumidifying the air is expensive per litre of water removed. Raising the surface temperature costs whatever the extra insulation costs, once. Venting a crack at night trades a little heat for a large drop in absolute humidity, and in a green house it is usually the right answer because the crop needs the air movement anyway.

Measure Effect on RH Heat penalty Capital Best for
Night crack vent, 2-3 deg C setback -8 to -15% RH 0.4-0.9 kW on a 96 m2 house 0 USD if vents exist Production green house
Anti-drip coating No change None 3-5 USD/m2 Any polycarbonate roof
Thicker PC / IGU No change -30 to -50% 8-16 USD/m2 Conservatory, orangerie
Thermal break in the frame No change -8 to -12% 18-28 USD/m2 Occupied structures
Mechanical dehumidification -20 to -30% RH +1.5-3.0 kW 600-1,800 USD Propagation and seedling houses
Circulation fans over the canopy -3 to -6% RH +0.1-0.2 kW 45-90 USD each Any house, for disease control

Aluminium in a Greenhouse: Fertiliser, Sulphur and Galvanic Corrosion

Aluminium is the right frame material for a green house because it does not rot and it carries the covering with a slim section. It is not inert. A greenhouse is a warm, wet, chemically aggressive environment, and the specific aggressors are fertiliser salts, sulphur vapour and copper-based fungicides. This section is the one most suppliers leave out of the quote.

What actually attacks an aluminium frame

Agent Source pH at the metal Mechanism Mitigation
NPK fertiliser dust Broadcast and drip feed 4.0-6.0 Pitting under wet deposits Rinse frames quarterly, Class 2 coating
Sulphur vapour Sulphur burners vs red spider mite 2.0-3.0 Sulphuric acid film, dissolves anodic layer AA20 sealed anodising, or exclude sulphur houses
Copper fungicide Bordeaux / copper oxychloride spray 5.5-7.0 Cu2+ plates onto Al, galvanic pitting Never spray bare aluminium; keep coating intact
Chloride Coastal sites, sea freight neutral Crevice corrosion at lap joints Class 2 powder or AA25 anodising, 316 fasteners
Ammonia High-N feed, cleaning agents 9.0-11.0 General attack above pH 9 Avoid ammonia-based cleaners
Cement / lime wash Dwarf wall construction 12.0-13.0 Rapid attack on bare metal Protect frames during base construction

Aluminium is amphoteric: it dissolves below pH 4 and above pH 9, and is passive in between. A greenhouse routinely presents both ends of that range at different times of year, which is why the coating, not the alloy, carries the durability.

Coating specification: what to write in the order

System Standard Class / grade Film Pre-treatment Typical life in a greenhouse
Polyester powder Qualicoat Class 1 60-80 um Chrome-free conversion 10-15 yr
Polyester powder Qualicoat Class 2 60-80 um Chrome-free conversion 5-8 yr
Super-durable powder Qualicoat Class 1.5 / 2 60-80 um Conversion + primer 15-20 yr
Anodising Qualanod AA15 15 um Etch + seal 10-15 yr
Anodising Qualanod AA20 20 um Etch + seal 20+ yr
Anodising Qualanod AA25 25 um Etch + seal 25+ yr, coastal
PVDF AAMA 2605 70% resin 30-40 um Conversion + primer 20+ yr

Fasteners and galvanic isolation

Aluminium sits at about -0.85 V on the galvanic scale. In contact with bare steel, copper or brass in a wet, salty film, the aluminium is the anode and it corrodes. Every steel fastener in a greenhouse frame is a potential galvanic cell.

Conservatory Specification: When Building Regulations Take Over

The moment a structure becomes occupied floor area, the design basis changes from crop science to building physics and the rules on this page stop being the governing ones. A conservatory is a room; a green house is a tool.

Thermal break, IGU and U-value targets

Element Green house (production) Conservatory (occupied) Standard
Frame Non-broken 6063-T5, Uf 5.0-7.0 Thermally broken, Uf 1.8-2.6 EN ISO 10077-2
Wall glazing 4 mm single, Ug 5.8 4-12-4 Low-E argon, Ug 1.1 EN 673
Roof glazing 6-16 mm PC or tempered, Ug 2.0-3.3 6-16-6 laminated, Ug 1.1-1.3 EN 673
Whole element Uw 5.5-6.5 1.4-2.0 EN ISO 10077-1
Condensation check Not required fRsi >= 0.70 EN ISO 13788
Air permeability Not required Class 2-4, 600 Pa EN 12207
Water tightness Not required Class 7A-9A EN 12208
Solar control Maximise g g 0.30-0.45 to limit overheating EN 410

The solar control row is the one that surprises people. A production green house wants a g-value as high as it can get. A conservatory on a south-facing wall in the UK or a west-facing wall in France will overheat every afternoon from May to September unless the roof glazing carries a solar-control coating that brings g down to roughly 0.35. Specifying production glass in an occupied room produces a space nobody uses for four months of the year.

Safety glazing, ventilation and the CE question

  1. All glazing within 800 mm of floor level, and all glazing in doors and side panels, has to be safety glass: EN 12150 tempered or EN 14449 laminated. In the US, ANSI Z97.1 and CPSC 16 CFR 1201. In the UK, BS EN 12600 Class 1B1 minimum for critical locations.
  2. Overhead glazing must retain fragments after breakage. Tempered glass meets the impact test but crumbles; laminated glass with a PVB or SGP interlayer meets the retention requirement. For a conservatory roof, specify laminated with the laminated pane on the inside.
  3. Ventilation: background ventilation plus a purge rate. Mechanically, size for 3 air changes per hour, or use the window-area rule of 1/20th of floor area with at least 1/10th of that as high-level opening for stack effect.
  4. Structural: the aluminium frame is a load-bearing kit and carries a CE mark under EN 1090-1 at EXC1, with a Declaration of Performance. The glazing carries its own DoP under EN 14351-1 for windows and doors, or EN 12150 / EN 14449 for the glass itself.
  5. Electrical: any motorised vent, heater or lighting in the structure needs CE / UKCA, and in North America UL or ETL listing. Wax-cylinder openers avoid the issue entirely and are worth considering for that reason alone.

For buyers who are actually specifying an occupied glazed room rather than a green house, the relevant pages are four-season sunroom specification, Wintergarten and aluminium conservatory, and Glashaus systems for the German market.

Orangerie Greenhouse: The Glazed Roof with a Solid Ceiling

An orangerie is the hybrid that most buyers actually want and few suppliers describe accurately. It has a solid, insulated roof over the perimeter of the room with a raised glazed lantern at the centre, and full-height glazed walls. The result is a room that is bright without behaving like a glass box.

What changes structurally

Element Conservatory Orangerie Consequence
Roof build-up Fully glazed Solid perimeter + glazed lantern Roof U falls to 0.15-0.25
Glazed roof area 100% of footprint 20-35% of footprint Solar gain cut by 65-80%
Lantern structure n/a Kerbs, hips, ridge, cresting More aluminium by mass, fewer glass m2
Roof snow load Governs glazing bar Governs the solid roof only Lantern is small and shielded
Internal ceiling Exposed glazing Plastered solid ceiling Needs a vapour control layer
Typical floor area 10-30 m2 20-60 m2 Orangeries tend to be larger

Because the glazed area is a small fraction of the footprint, an orangerie does not need solar-control glass to the same degree, and the lantern is usually the only place where a high-performance coating is worth paying for. The frame requirement per square metre of floor is in fact higher than a conservatory, because the lantern kerb, hips and ridge all have to be built, so the per-m2 frame cost does not fall in proportion to the glazing area.

Sizing the lantern and the cresting detail

Specification trap: an orangerie is quoted per square metre of floor area and a conservatory per square metre of glazed envelope. The two numbers are not comparable: a 30 m2 orangerie has about 55 m2 of glazing, a 30 m2 conservatory about 75 m2. Always convert to glazed area before comparing quotes.

Buyers comparing orangerie options against other garden structures should also read garden room and winter garden specifications and aluminium pergola and gazebo frames.

From Billet to Kit: Process, Tolerances and Inspection Points

A greenhouse kit is a cut-list problem more than a fabrication problem. Every bar is cut to length, punched for its fixings, and packed against a numbered drawing. The process below is a standard 6063-T5 route with polyester powder coating.

Twelve process steps and where the time goes

# Step Control parameter Days Share
1 Billet cast and homogenise 6063 composition, Mg 0.45-0.90%, Si 0.20-0.60% 0.5 2%
2 Extrusion Die temperature 460-500 deg C, exit speed 8-20 m/min 0.5 2%
3 Stretch and age T5: cool and age 8 h at 175 deg C 1.0 4%
4 Cut to length +/- 0.5 mm on bars under 3 m 0.5 2%
5 Punch / CNC Hole position +/- 0.3 mm 0.5 2%
6 Bend (hips, ridges) Angle +/- 0.5 deg 0.5 2%
7 Deburr and wash No cutting oil residue 0.3 1%
8 Pre-treatment Chrome-free conversion, rinse conductivity 0.5 2%
9 Powder coating Cure 200 deg C for 10 min metal temperature 1.0 4%
10 Glass / PC cutting Pane size +/- 1.5 mm, edge arris 2.0 8%
11 Kit assembly and check-build Full dry assembly of one unit per size 2.0 8%
12 Pack and label Numbered bundles against the cut list 1.0 4%

That accounts for roughly 10 days of the 20-35 day lead time. The remaining time is queue, coating line scheduling, and the buyer-side step that is almost always the longest single item: drawing approval, 5-9 days, or 17-30 per cent of the total. It is the only step the buyer controls, and it is the only one worth compressing. Approve the shop drawings within 24 hours and the lead time drops by a week at no cost.

Inspection points that matter

  1. Alloy certificate: EN 573-3 composition and EN 755-2 mechanical properties for the heat lot.
  2. Wall thickness: measure at three points on a cut end, minimum 90 per cent of nominal.
  3. Coating thickness: 60-80 um dry film, ISO 2360, measured on six faces of the bar.
  4. Coating cure: MEK double rub, 50+ rubs without softening.
  5. Adhesion: ISO 2409 cross-hatch, Class 0.
  6. Cut length: +/- 0.5 mm; a 2 mm error on a glazing bar produces a visible step at the ridge.
  7. Glass: EN 12150 fragment count report, or EN 14449 for laminate; check the pane size and the edge work.
  8. Polycarbonate: UV-side marking on the film, sheet thickness measured with a caliper on a cut offcut, co-extruded layer present on the marked face.
  9. Hardware: stainless grade verified by a spot test, not by the box label.
  10. Check-build: insist that one complete unit is dry-assembled and photographed before the container is loaded. This single step catches more errors than all the others combined.

FOB Pricing, MOQ, Lead Time and Container Loading

Prices below are FOB Shenzhen or Foshan in USD per square metre of floor area, which is how greenhouse kits are quoted. To convert to glazed envelope area, divide by 2.25. To convert to a whole-set figure for the 96 m2 reference house, multiply by 96.

FOB matrix by configuration and quantity

Ref Configuration 1-2 sets 3-9 sets 10-29 sets 30+ sets
G1 4 mm glass walls, 6 mm PC roof, 1 door, no vents 95 78 62 48
G2 5 mm tempered walls, 10 mm PC roof, ridge vent 130 110 92 76
G3 6 mm tempered walls, 16 mm PC roof, ridge + side vents 185 160 138 118
G4 Full glass, 6 mm tempered walls and roof, ridge vent 235 205 180 158
G5 Orangerie, solid kerb + glazed lantern, cresting 275 240 212 188
G6 Conservatory spec, IGU walls, laminated IGU roof 420 370 330 295

G1 to G6 spans 48-420 USD/m2 of floor, a factor of nearly nine. The spread is driven by glazing, not by aluminium: the frame is 18-32 per cent of the kit cost in every configuration, and the covering plus hardware is the rest. A buyer who needs to cut budget should first reduce the vent specification and the glass thickness, and only then the frame section, because the frame is what cannot be retrofitted.

Options and additions

Item Unit Add Item Unit Add
Thermal break in frame USD/m2 18-28 Automatic vent opener (wax) USD each 22-38
Diffuse AR glass upgrade USD/m2 8-12 Electric actuator + thermostat USD each 85-140
Heat-soak testing USD/m2 4-7 Louvre side vent USD/m2 32-48
Anti-drip coating USD/m2 3-5 Circulation fan USD each 45-90
Laminated roof glass USD/m2 22-35 Thermal screen + drive USD/m2 floor 18-28
AAMA 2605 / PVDF USD/m2 12-18 Staging benches USD/m2 floor 14-22
AA25 anodising USD/m2 10-16 Gutter + downpipe kit USD/m 18-30
316 stainless fasteners USD/set 35-90 Base / dwarf wall channel USD/m 12-20
Insect screen 25 mesh USD/m2 6-10 LED supplementary lighting USD/m2 floor 45-120
Double door upgrade USD each 120-260 Shade cloth 50% USD/m2 4-8

Commercial terms, packing and container loading

Item Term
MOQ 1 set for samples; production pricing from 20 m2 / 3 sets
Lead time 20-35 days after drawing approval; 15 days for a repeat order
Payment T/T 30% deposit, 70% before shipment; L/C at sight for 30+ sets
Incoterm FOB Shenzhen / Foshan standard; EXW, CIF and DDP available
Packing EPE foam + kraft, plywood crate with steel strapping; glass in A-frame crates
Warranty 10 yr frame coating, 5 yr hardware, 2 yr moving parts
Documents DoP for the frame under EN 1090-1, glass certificates, packing list, CoO

Container loading is where glass greenhouses surprise people. A 40 ft high-cube gives about 68 m3 of usable volume and a 25 t payload. Glass is dense, so the payload limit arrives long before the volume does:

Kit Configuration Mass Volume By payload By volume Per 40HQ Limit Freight/set
K1 4 mm glass + 6 mm PC 1,473 kg 1.85 m3 16 36 16 Payload 175 USD
K2 5 mm tempered + 10 mm PC 1,808 kg 2.05 m3 13 33 13 Payload 215 USD
K3 6 mm tempered + 16 mm PC 2,248 kg 2.30 m3 11 29 11 Payload 255 USD
K4 Full glass 6 mm 3,495 kg 2.55 m3 7 26 7 Payload 400 USD
K5 Conservatory IGU spec 5,630 kg 2.90 m3 4 23 4 Payload 700 USD

Every configuration is payload-limited, and the full-glass kit is the extreme case: 26 would fit by volume but only 7 fit by weight. Two consequences follow. First, never ship a glass greenhouse LCL if you can avoid it: at 5 sets the freight is roughly 560 USD per set against 175-400 USD in a full container, and glass breaks far more often in LCL because it is handled more. Second, swapping the walls from glass to polycarbonate roughly doubles the number of sets per container and halves the freight per set, which is worth checking against the light loss before you commit.

Installation Sequence and the Six Failure Points

A 96 m2 kit installs in 2-3 days with three people and a scaffold tower. The sequence matters because every step is a tolerance that the next step inherits.

Sequence

  1. Set out and build the base. Concrete strip footing or a cast plinth, level to +/- 3 mm over the full length. A base that is out of level by 10 mm produces a door that will not latch and a glazing bar that will not seat.
  2. Fix the base rail on a DPC strip, shimmed, with M10 anchors at 600 mm centres. Isolate the aluminium from the concrete.
  3. Stand the corner posts and plumb them in two axes. Brace before you release the post.
  4. Build the gable ends, then the eave beam. Square the frame by measuring both diagonals: they must agree within 5 mm.
  5. Fit the glazing bars from eave to ridge, then the ridge beam. Do not fit the ridge until every bar is seated.
  6. Fit the gutter and set the fall: minimum 0.5 per cent, 1 per cent preferred. Standing water in a gutter breeds mosquitoes and splits the joint in a freeze.
  7. Glaze the walls. Two EPDM setting blocks per pane at the quarter points, 4-5 mm edge clearance all round, and glazing clips at the specified centres.
  8. Glaze the roof with PC: oversize holes, 3-4 mm per metre expansion gap, UV face out, anti-drip face in, breather tape at the bottom, aluminium tape at the top.
  9. Fit doors, vents and openers. Set the wax cylinders to open at the target temperature and re-check them at the start of each season.
  10. Seal the perimeter with neutral-cure silicone, flood-test the gutters, and run every vent through five full cycles before sign-off.

Six failure points, in order of how often they happen

# Failure Mechanism Cost to fix later Prevention
1 PC sheet buckles or pulls out No expansion gap, holes drilled tight 120-260 USD/sheet + labour Oversize holes, shoulder washers, 3-4 mm/m gap
2 Drip line under the glazing bar No anti-drip coating, no condensate channel Crop loss, 8-12% light Specify anti-drip + condensate channel
3 Glass pane slides and cracks Missing setting blocks, edge clearance too tight 90-180 USD/pane Two setting blocks at quarter points, 4-5 mm clearance
4 Gutter stands or splits Fall under 0.5%, no expansion joint 180-400 USD 1% fall, slip joint every 6 m
5 Frame pitting at the base rail Aluminium on wet concrete, pH 12.5 Base rail replacement DPC strip + bituminous paint on the contact face
6 Vents open at the wrong temperature Wax cylinder not calibrated, linkage slop Overheating or chill damage Calibrate at commissioning and twice yearly

Points 1, 2 and 3 are specification issues, not workmanship issues. They are decided at the order stage and cannot be fixed on site, which is why the covering and glazing accessory schedule deserves as much attention as the frame.

Two Projects and a Material Comparison

Two builds, one snow-governed and one specification-governed, with the numbers that were actually signed off.

Quebec, Canada: 96 m2 production green house, snow-governed

Item Value
Size 8.0 x 12.0 m, 96 m2 floor, 2.5 m eaves, 22 deg pitch
Ground snow (NBCC 2020) 2.20 kN/m2; roof snow 1.76 kN/m2 with mu = 0.8
Design total 2.06 kN/m2 including 0.30 dead
Glazing bar P4 80 x 50 x 2.0 at 750 mm centres, span 4.31 m
Bar span check Max permissible 1.71 m at 750 mm centres in LC4 – does not work
Resolution Intermediate purlin at mid-slope, effective span 2.15 m; utilisation 0.71
Alternative rejected P6 120 x 60 x 3.0 full span – 2.07 x the frame mass, +680 USD
Walls 6 mm tempered, panes 1.05 x 2.10 m (limit 1.25 m short span)
Roof 16 mm 5-wall PC, anti-drip, U 2.0, LT 76%
Heating UA 946 W/K, peak 28.4 kW at dT 30 K; 29 kW condensing unit installed
Annual energy 56,173 kWh (585 kWh/m2), 5,617 USD/yr at 0.10 USD/kWh
Ventilation Ridge 1.0 m x 12 m at 45 deg + 2 side vents; 12,473 m3/h at dT 8 K
Delivered FOB 15,360 USD (160 USD/m2, G3 at 10-29 sets)
Freight + duty to Montreal 3,060 USD; landed 19,180 USD
Installed total 27,900 USD (291 USD/m2)
Local quotation 45,300 USD (472 USD/m2)
Saving 17,400 USD, -38.4%
Observations at 18 months Roof snow shedding normal, 0 bar deflection complaints, 2 of 12 wax openers re-calibrated after the first winter

The interesting line is the bar span check. At 2.06 kN/m2 no reasonable glazing bar makes 4.31 m at 750 mm centres, and increasing the section to P6 would have added 680 USD of aluminium for the same result. An intermediate purlin at mid-slope halved the effective span for about 90 USD of material. This is the same argument as for a glass door frame or a glass garage door panel: when deflection governs, add a support, do not buy a bigger section.

Cotswolds, UK: 27 m2 orangerie, specification-governed

Item Value
Size 6.0 x 4.5 m, 27 m2 floor, 2.7 m eaves
Roof Solid insulated perimeter U 0.18 + glazed lantern 3.0 x 1.8 m (20% of floor)
Lantern glazing 6-12.8-6 laminated Low-E, Ug 1.1, g 0.35, LT 71%
Walls 4-16-4 IGU in thermally broken frames, Uw 1.6
Frame Thermally broken, Uf 2.2, fRsi 0.76 (EN ISO 13788 pass)
Snow 0.60 kN/m2 ground, LC1 equivalent
Vents 2 lantern vents, wax openers, 18 deg C setpoint
Coating Qualicoat Class 1, anthracite, 70 um
Delivered FOB 6,480 USD (240 USD/m2, G5 at 3-9 sets)
Freight + duty to Felixstowe 1,290 USD; landed 7,940 USD
Installed total 13,600 USD (504 USD/m2)
Local quotation 21,900 USD (811 USD/m2)
Saving 8,300 USD, -37.9%
Overheating check Peak internal 27.4 deg C against 34.1 deg C for a fully glazed roof of the same footprint

The 6.7 K reduction in peak internal temperature is entirely due to cutting the glazed roof area from 100 per cent to 20 per cent of the footprint. That is the argument for an orangerie over a conservatory in a south-facing UK garden, and it costs about 15 per cent more per square metre of floor.

Frame material comparison

Criterion Aluminium Galvanised steel Timber uPVC
Mass per m of bar 0.54-3.63 kg 1.8-7.5 kg 2.5-6.0 kg 1.6-3.2 kg
Section depth for the same span Slimmest Similar Deepest Deepest, needs liner
Corrosion in a wet, fertilised environment Good with Class 1/AA20 Good if Z275+ Poor without treatment Excellent
Reaction to sulphur vapour Attacked, needs sealed anodising Attacked Attacked Resistant
Maintenance interval 10 yr (rinse yearly) 10-15 yr 2-3 yr None
Max span without intermediate support 3.9 m (P7) 4.5 m 2.4 m 1.8 m
Thermal conductivity High, needs a break High Low Low
Recycled content 60-80% typical 30-50% 0% Low
Tooling cost for a custom profile 600-1,500 USD 2,000-5,000 USD n/a 8,000-20,000 USD
FOB frame cost index 100 85 120 95

Steel is cheaper per metre and spans further, which is why commercial Venlo structures are steel. For anything under about 200 m2, aluminium wins on tooling cost, maintenance and the ability to carry a coating that survives the chemistry. Timber looks right on a heritage orangerie and needs repainting every three years. uPVC is cheapest to run but cannot span, so it needs a steel or aluminium liner above about 2.5 m, at which point the cost advantage disappears.

RFQ Checklist, Glossary and Standard Index

Send these 16 points with the enquiry and you will get a quote that can actually be compared with another one.

Technical items to specify

  1. Dimensions: width, length, eaves height, ridge height, roof pitch, door positions and sizes.
  2. Design code and loads: ground snow sk, basic wind velocity, terrain category, roof shape coefficient, whether asymmetric snow is required.
  3. Covering: walls and roof separately, with thickness, structure (twin/3-wall/5-wall), LT, U-value, anti-drip yes/no, UV warranty years.
  4. Glass: annealed / heat-strengthened / tempered / laminated, thickness, edge work, heat-soak yes/no, EN 12150 or EN 14449 certificate required.
  5. Frame: alloy and temper, section dimensions, wall thickness, thermally broken yes/no.
  6. Coating: standard and class (Qualicoat Class 1/2, Qualanod AA15/AA20/AA25, AAMA 2605), colour, film thickness.
  7. Fasteners: 304 or 316 stainless, isolation gaskets at steel or concrete interfaces.
  8. Ventilation: ridge and side vent dimensions, opening angle, actuator type and setpoint, insect screen mesh.

Commercial items to specify

  1. Quantity and the target price tier (1-2, 3-9, 10-29, 30+ sets).
  2. Incoterm: FOB, CIF, DDP, and the port.
  3. Packing: crate specification, whether glass travels in A-frame crates, labelling language.
  4. Lead time requirement and the drawing approval turnaround you can commit to.
  5. Payment terms: T/T split or L/C, and whether a deposit is acceptable.
  6. Documents: DoP under EN 1090-1, glass certificates, alloy certificate, certificate of origin.
  7. Warranty: coating years, hardware years, and what voids it (sulphur, copper, ammonia).
  8. Spares: percentage of glass, gasket and fastener spares to ship with the order. 2-3 per cent of glass area is normal.

Glossary

Term Meaning
Glazing bar The extruded member that runs eave to ridge and carries the covering
Purlin Intermediate horizontal member that shortens the glazing bar span
Twin-wall / multi-wall PC Polycarbonate sheet with 2, 3 or 5 internal walls
Anti-drip Hydrophilic inner coating that turns condensate droplets into a film
Haze Percentage of transmitted light that is scattered, i.e. diffused
PAR Photosynthetically active radiation, 400-700 nm
VPD Vapour pressure deficit, the driver of transpiration and condensation risk
fRsi Temperature factor, the condensation and mould check on a surface
Ug / Uf / Uw Thermal transmittance of glazing / frame / whole window element
g-value / SHGC Total solar energy transmittance; high is good in a green house
sk Characteristic ground snow load
mu Roof shape coefficient converting ground snow to roof snow
fRsi 0.70 The usual pass mark below which surface condensation forms
AA20 / AA25 Qualanod anodising thickness grades, 20 and 25 microns
Heat soak EN 14179 process that precipitates nickel-sulphide breakage in tempered glass
EXC1 EN 1090 execution class for simple, non-fatigue structures

Standard index

Related pages

ROGENILAN supplies aluminium green house kits, glass greenhouse structures, conservatories and orangeries from Foshan, Guangdong. Frame extrusion, coating, glazing and hardware are produced in-house; shop drawings are issued within 72 hours of order confirmation.

[footer_contact_form]